A
theory is an explanation for a very general class of phenomena or observations.
Modern Biology is founded on two key theories: The cell theory and the theory of evolution.
A
cell is defined as a highly organized compartment bounded by a thin, flexible structure called a plasma membrane and that contains concentrated chemicals in an aqueous (watery) solution.
The Cell Theory says that all organisms are composed of cells and all cells come from other cells.
The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection says that new species develop from preexisting species and that all species change through time as a whole through mutations that affect the fitness of the composite organisms.
Fitness is defined as the ability of those organisms to reproduce and to survive.
A trait that improves the fitness of an organism within a particular environment is called an
adaptation.
Cell theory contradicted the prevalent previous theory (or rather hypothesis) that life develops spontaneously. In the late 1850s, scientist Louis Pasteur decided to test the
Spontaneous Generation Hypothesis by setting up two beakers of 'pasteurized' broth, one open to the air and thus vulnerable to being settled in by bacteria and the other closed to the air. He left both for months during which the first beaker filled quickly with bacteria and fungi and the second beaker did not. His conclusion was that cells arise only from preexisting cells, not spontaneously from nonliving material. This convinced scientists that the
All Cells-from-Cells Hypothesis was correct and not the Spontaneous Generation Hypothesis.
Recall that Cell Theory states that all cells come from pre-existing cells (this is called
the process component of Cell Theory). If this is so, then in organisms that each have only one cell (Single-Celled organisms), each organism must come from another organism, who must have come from a previous organism, and so on tracing back to a single organism or mother of them all.
----note: I'm not following that last bit of logic. This does not demonstrate that all the single-celled organisms have a common ancestor. If they could all have one common ancestor that didn't come from a cell, then why could there have been two or more lines or two ancestors that developed from something other than a cell and spawned two separate lines of single celled organisms? In other words, clearly not all cells came from other cells unless you believe that there have always been cells going back infinitely into the past, but if there were ancestor cells that came about some other way, why not believe that there were more than one of these original/first ancestor cells?It was the scientists Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace that, separately, published essays hypothesizing that all
species are connected by a common ancestry. They defined
species as all distinct, identifiable types of organisms.
Darwin stated that
natural selection changes the characteristics of a wild population over time, just as the deliberate manipulation of "
artificial selection" changes the characteristics of a domesticated population over time.